The Ancient Art of Connection

HOME INTRODUCTION THE SOLUTION BOOKS AND MORE
ABOUT AUTHOR CONTACT
  The Solution - Part 4  

The Solution - Part 1

Awareness

The Solution - Part 2

What's the Problem?

The Solution - Part 3

The basics

The Solution - Part 4

Beliefs

The Solution - Part 5

Putting It Together

Beliefs

As I said before, there is not a single thing anyone could say that would that would be believed by everyone. The moment a belief system is chosen, be it religious, scientific, or spiritual, everyone outside that belief is necessarily excluded.

So how do we include everyone?

Regardless of whether your belief is strongly defined or completely unconscious, it plays a decisive role in how you perceive the world around you and how you react to it. As such, we must understand exactly how our beliefs exert this control and what this means to us as individuals and to all humankind.

Any organization, even a secular democratic government, caters to certain beliefs. The survival of any organization is dependent upon how well their followers feel their beliefs are being represented. That is why you will not see an article on how to most effectively know the will of God in New Scientist.

This is also why any organization needs to tread so very carefully whenever it speaks publicly. Sometimes, even a single mistake can irreparably damage the loyalty of its followers.

Isn’t that what you are doing right now – trying to determine if the information on this site matches, reinforces, and/or expands your perception of truth? To save you the trouble, I can tell you right now that even if it has so far, it will not continue to do so.

This is why: this work assumes all beliefs contain unique truth(s) that are crucial parts describing reality. 

There is a way to see this that is inclusive of what everyone believes, but as things stand right now, the opposite is true. While a view that includes all beliefs can act as a powerful meeting place, everyone will also be in the presence of elements with which they disagree.

You must choose how to respond when this happens.

We are "trained" to be more sensitive to disagreement than agreement. Even a single disagreement can cause us to disengage from something that previously fascinated us. 

Throwing everything away because of a single discordant note is a bit like throwing away your baby the first time you throw away old nappies or diapers. This creates artificially large disconnections between two points of view and thus allows shadows of disconnections to form in our communities and society. Within these large shadows, some very destructive patterns can form.

On the other hand, if we can learn to look at ideas and see how they might fit within our belief systems instead of creating walls between ourselves, an amazing thing could happen.

Scientists using microscopes don't usually attack the findings of those with a telescopes. As a community, we put together what these two groups study (and many others) to conceive a far greater picture than only one group alone could.

Similarly, we could put all our pictures together and see something far greater than any single belief alone can see.

In order to do this, we need to find a way to allow ourselves to have a different reaction whenever ideas outside our beliefs challenge our own. 

I am not suggesting submission, I am suggesting expansion.

I sincerely hope you give this a chance and don't abandon it the first time you read something that you are certain cannot be true.

Go to The Solution - Part 5

Tim Gooding © 2007 | URL: http://www.timgooding.com/index.htm | Webdesign: Liz Elliott